Hiring SREs means finding engineers who keep production systems running reliably while balancing feature velocity with stability. You need candidates who can define SLOs and SLIs, manage error budgets, lead incident response, and reduce toil across distributed infrastructure. This guide explains how AI interviews screen for the operational depth and systems thinking that separate strong SREs from engineers who only know the theory.
Can AI Actually Interview SREs?
Skeptics wonder if an AI can judge the real-world instincts that define a skilled SRE. The doubt is reasonable. SRE work involves debugging cascading failures in distributed systems, writing postmortems that drive lasting fixes, and making hard calls about error budgets under pressure. These feel like skills you can only evaluate by watching someone work through a live outage with your team.
AI interviews handle SRE screening effectively when they simulate production scenarios rather than ask trivia. The AI can present a candidate with a degraded Kubernetes cluster and ask them to walk through their triage process, explain how they would configure Prometheus alerts tied to SLIs, or describe their approach to chaos engineering experiments that test auto-scaling behavior. Follow-up questions adapt based on the depth of each response, pushing past rehearsed answers.
Where human interviews still add value is in judging how an SRE communicates during incidents and negotiates reliability targets with product teams. The ability to lead a blameless postmortem or convince stakeholders to pause feature work when an error budget is exhausted requires interpersonal judgment. The AI interview handles the technical screening so your on-call leads only spend time with candidates who already demonstrate strong reliability fundamentals.
Why Use AI Interviews for SREs
SRE candidates need to operate across incident response, observability, capacity planning, and infrastructure automation every week. The skills that matter most, like diagnosing a latency spike using Grafana dashboards or deciding when to trigger a rollback based on error budget burn rate, require structured evaluation that casual conversations rarely cover well.
Expose Gaps in Incident Response Readiness
Many SRE candidates can recite the incident management lifecycle but struggle with specifics. AI interviews probe whether they know how to configure PagerDuty escalation policies, triage a multi-service outage using distributed tracing, or write a postmortem that identifies contributing factors beyond the immediate trigger. These questions surface gaps that resume keywords and certifications hide.
Standardize the Evaluation Across Candidates
Without a consistent process, one interviewer might focus entirely on Linux troubleshooting while another only asks about SLO definitions. AI interviews fix this. Every candidate is assessed on the same core SRE topics: SLOs and error budget management, incident response workflows, Prometheus and Grafana observability, capacity planning, and toil reduction strategies.
Protect Your On-Call Team's Time
Your senior SREs are managing incidents, tuning alerts, running chaos engineering experiments, and reviewing production changes. Pulling them into repetitive screening calls adds toil to their already loaded schedules. AI interviews run the technical filter first, and your team reviews structured scorecards instead of blocking out another hour for a phone screen.
See a Sample Engineering Interview Report
Review a real Engineering Interview conducted by Fabric.
How to Design an AI Interview for SREs
A strong SRE interview balances incident response, observability, and infrastructure reliability topics. Focus on how candidates maintain production systems under real-world conditions rather than testing isolated knowledge of monitoring tool syntax.
Incident Response and Postmortem Practices
Ask candidates to walk through how they would handle a multi-region outage affecting a critical service. Probe their triage process: how they assess blast radius, coordinate communication channels, and decide between mitigation and full rollback. Follow up on their postmortem approach, specifically whether they focus on systemic contributing factors and action items rather than assigning blame. Strong candidates will reference specific tools like PagerDuty for alerting and describe how they track follow-through on postmortem action items.
SLOs, SLIs, and Error Budget Management
Cover how they define SLIs for different service types and set SLO targets that balance reliability with development velocity. Ask what happens when an error budget is nearly exhausted and how they communicate that trade-off to product teams. Candidates with production experience will describe real scenarios where they paused feature releases to stabilize a service or adjusted an SLO after analyzing user-facing impact data.
Infrastructure Reliability and Capacity Planning
Explore their approach to keeping distributed systems healthy at scale. Ask about load balancing strategies, Kubernetes cluster sizing, auto-scaling policies, and how they use chaos engineering to validate resilience assumptions before outages happen. Probe their Linux troubleshooting workflow when diagnosing performance degradation across hosts, and how they plan capacity ahead of traffic spikes using historical data from Prometheus.
The interview typically runs 45 to 60 minutes. Afterwards, the hiring team receives a structured scorecard covering each skill area.
AI Interviews for SREs with Fabric
Fabric is the only AI interview tool with live code execution. Candidates write and run code in 20+ languages during the interview, which means your SRE screens go beyond verbal descriptions and into working implementations of monitoring scripts, automation tasks, and infrastructure logic.
Live Code Execution for Operational Tasks
Candidates write scripts that run in real time during the Fabric interview. They might implement a Prometheus alerting rule based on an SLI definition, write a Python script that parses logs to calculate error rates over a time window, or build a capacity planning calculation that projects resource needs from historical metrics. You see working code and actual output, not just whiteboard diagrams.
Adaptive Follow-Ups That Test Depth
Fabric's AI adjusts its questions based on how candidates respond. If someone mentions experience running chaos engineering experiments, the interview digs into their failure injection approach, how they scoped blast radius, and what they learned from the results. If a candidate brings up toil reduction work, the AI follows up on how they prioritized automation targets and measured time savings. Surface-level answers get challenged rather than accepted.
Structured Scorecards for Faster Hiring Decisions
Fabric generates interview reports that break down candidate performance across incident response, SLO management, observability tooling, and infrastructure reliability. Your SRE leads can review these scorecards in minutes and decide who moves forward to a system design or on-call simulation round, without sitting through every initial screen themselves.
Get Started with AI Interviews for SREs
Try a sample interview yourself or talk to our team about your hiring needs.